BeHeard is now Gather.
    Back to Reports

    Decision · Win/Loss Analysis

    Nexus ERP

    Purchase criteria and competitive win/loss intelligence

    400 decisions analyzed

    Win: 180 · Loss: 220

    Mid-market (100–2,000 emp.)

    Executive summary

    Overall Win Rate

    45%

    +3pp vs H1

    Avg. Sales Cycle

    127 days

    -12 days

    #1 Win Reason

    Speed to go-live

    #1 Loss Reason

    Vendor credibility

    Nexus ERP wins on speed and support — loses on credibility and references. The pattern is consistent: buyers who engage with Nexus's product experience (demo, trial) convert at 68%. Buyers who evaluate Nexus primarily through desk research and vendor comparisons choose competitors 72% of the time.

    The implication is clear: Nexus's sales motion must get buyers into the product faster. Every week a deal spends in "evaluation" without a hands-on experience increases loss probability by 11%.

    Decision criteria ranking

    How buyers rank purchase criteria, and how Nexus performs vs. competitor average.

    Criterion
    Importance
    Nexus Score
    Competitor Avg
    Implementation timeline
    92%
    82
    55
    Total cost of ownership (3-yr)
    88%
    68
    62
    Industry-specific workflows
    85%
    72
    71
    Vendor support responsiveness
    82%
    88
    52
    Integration with existing stack
    78%
    65
    68
    User interface / ease of adoption
    75%
    78
    48
    Reference customers in same industry
    72%
    55
    72
    Financial stability of vendor
    68%
    45
    82

    Win vs. loss patterns

    What differentiates deals Nexus wins from those it loses.

    When Nexus wins

    Buyer had a product demo within first 2 weeks
    Implementation speed was the #1 priority
    Primary evaluator was an operations leader (not IT)
    Nexus support team was engaged during evaluation
    Buyer had a peer reference in the same industry

    When Nexus loses

    Evaluation lasted 4+ months without product access
    IT department led the evaluation (not operations)
    Buyer relied on analyst reports and G2 reviews
    Competitor had stronger brand recognition
    Concerns about Nexus's financial stability / longevity

    Buyer quotes

    Won
    "Nexus was live in 6 weeks. The incumbent told us 6 months. That's not a feature comparison — that's a business decision."

    — COO, Distribution, 800 employees

    Lost
    "I loved the product but couldn't get my CIO comfortable. He'd never heard of Nexus. When the board asks 'why not SAP?' I need a better answer than 'it's faster.'"

    — VP Operations, Manufacturing, 1,500 employees

    Won
    "Their support team joined our eval calls. No other vendor did that. It told me everything about how they'd treat us as a customer."

    — Director IT, Logistics, 600 employees

    Lost
    "We went with the competitor because they had 12 case studies in our industry. Nexus had zero. The product was better but we couldn't take the risk."

    — CFO, Healthcare, 400 employees

    Recommendations

    01

    Get buyers into the product within 10 days

    Deals with early product access win at 68%. Create a self-serve sandbox and expedited demo process. Every day without hands-on experience is a day the competitor's brand advantage compounds.

    02

    Invest heavily in industry references and case studies

    The #1 loss driver is credibility. Launch a customer marketing program targeting 3–5 case studies per vertical. Peer references convert skeptics better than any feature comparison.

    03

    Arm champions to sell internally

    Operations leaders love Nexus but can't get IT/CFO buy-in. Create executive-ready materials that address financial stability, security posture, and long-term roadmap concerns.

    Methodology

    Sample

    400 recent purchase decisions (180 wins, 220 losses) across mid-market companies (100–2,000 employees). Respondents are the primary decision-maker or key influencer in each deal. Interviewed within 30 days of decision.

    Approach

    15-minute AI-moderated depth interviews combining quantitative measurement (criteria importance ranking, vendor satisfaction scores, competitive benchmarking, deal-stage timing analysis) with qualitative exploration (open-ended probes on decision triggers, internal dynamics, competitive comparisons, and the specific moments that tipped each deal). Each interview produces structured win/loss data and verbatim transcripts.

    Know why you win — and why you lose

    Gather runs continuous win/loss programs that keep your sales team aligned with how buyers actually decide.

    Talk to us